{"id":2206,"date":"2026-11-14T15:13:00","date_gmt":"2026-11-14T20:13:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.xconvert.com\/blog\/?p=2206"},"modified":"2026-08-31T23:13:29","modified_gmt":"2026-09-01T03:13:29","slug":"doc-vs-docx","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.xconvert.com\/blog\/doc-vs-docx","title":{"rendered":"DOC vs DOCX: Open Old Word Files, and When .doc Still Wins"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Two very different people search for \u201cDOC vs DOCX\u201d. One has found a folder of <code>.doc<\/code> files from 2003 on an old drive and wants to know whether anything still opens them. The other has a perfectly good <code>.docx<\/code> and a submission portal that flatly refuses it, and needs to go <em>backwards<\/em>. This covers both directions using Microsoft\u2019s own format definitions \u2014 including the part almost nobody mentions: \u201cDOCX is an ISO standard\u201d is only half true of the DOCX files you actually have.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\"><p><strong>Quick answer:<\/strong> <code>.doc<\/code> is the <strong>binary<\/strong> Word 97-2003 format. <code>.docx<\/code> is the <strong>XML-based<\/strong> format that has been Word\u2019s default since Word 2007 \u2014 a ZIP package of XML parts, built on ECMA-376 \/ ISO\/IEC 29500. Current Word still opens and saves both, so a <code>.doc<\/code> is not unopenable; it just runs in Compatibility Mode. Convert <strong>to .docx<\/strong> for anything you\u2019ll keep, edit, or collaborate on. Convert <strong>to .doc<\/strong> only when something downstream demands it \u2014 a legacy line-of-business system, an old template engine, or an upload form whose allowed-extension list was written before 2007. Keep the <code>.docx<\/code> as your master either way, because saving down is the lossy direction.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Jump to a section<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\"><li><a href=\"#formats\">What the two formats actually are<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#strict\">The Strict vs Transitional wrinkle<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#need-doc\">When you still need .doc<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#wont-open\">When a .doc won\u2019t open<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#tool\">Convert between DOC and DOCX on xconvert<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#faq\">FAQ<\/a><\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"formats\">What the two formats actually are<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Microsoft\u2019s own file-format reference is unambiguous. <code>.doc<\/code> is \u201cthe binary file format for Word 97-Word 2003.\u201d <code>.docx<\/code> is \u201cthe default XML-based file format for Word 2021, Word 2019, Word 2016, Word 2013, Word 2010, and Office Word 2007.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">That is the whole story: <strong>one is a binary container, the other is a ZIP full of XML.<\/strong> Rename a <code>.docx<\/code> to <code>.zip<\/code> and open it and you\u2019ll find <code>word\/document.xml<\/code>, a <code>media<\/code> folder with your images, and the styles and relationship parts that glue them together. Do the same to a <code>.doc<\/code> and you get nothing readable \u2014 it is an OLE2 compound binary, a filesystem-within-a-file of streams and storages, specified by Microsoft as <code>[MS-DOC]<\/code>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Microsoft\u2019s protocol documentation lists the four formats Word persists to: the <strong>Word Binary File Format<\/strong> (<code>[MS-DOC]<\/code>), the <strong>Ecma Office Open XML File Format<\/strong> (<code>[ECMA-376]<\/code>), the <strong>Office Open XML File Format<\/strong> (<code>[ISO\/IEC 29500-1:2016]<\/code>), and <strong>OpenDocument<\/strong>. Everything else Word writes \u2014 RTF, HTML, PDF, plain text \u2014 is an export, not a native document.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The extension family confuses people more than the binary\/XML split does. Straight from Microsoft\u2019s table:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table><thead><tr><th>Extension<\/th><th>Microsoft\u2019s name for it<\/th><th>What it means in practice<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td><code>.doc<\/code><\/td><td>Word 97-2003 Document<\/td><td>The legacy binary format<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><code>.docx<\/code><\/td><td>Word Document<\/td><td>The XML default since Word 2007<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><code>.docx<\/code><\/td><td>Strict Open XML Document<\/td><td>A <em>different<\/em> save option \u2014 see below<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><code>.docm<\/code><\/td><td>Word Macro-Enabled Document<\/td><td>XML format that \u201cstores Visual Basic for Applications (VBA) macro code\u201d<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><code>.dot<\/code><\/td><td>Word 97-2003 Template<\/td><td>Legacy binary template<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><code>.dotx<\/code><\/td><td>Word Template<\/td><td>Modern template, no macros<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><code>.dotm<\/code><\/td><td>Word Macro-Enabled Template<\/td><td>Modern template that can carry macros<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><code>.rtf<\/code><\/td><td>Rich Text Format<\/td><td>An interchange format, not a Word document<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><code>.wps<\/code><\/td><td>Works 6-9 Document<\/td><td>Microsoft Works, a different application entirely<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The practical takeaway from that table: <strong>if your old <code>.doc<\/code> contains macros, <code>.docx<\/code> is not where they go \u2014 <code>.docm<\/code> is.<\/strong> A macro-bearing document converted to plain <code>.docx<\/code> arrives with its text and formatting intact and its automation gone.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"strict\">The Strict vs Transitional wrinkle<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Here is the part that rarely makes it into DOC-vs-DOCX explainers, and it matters if you care about long-term archiving.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">There are two <code>.docx<\/code> rows in Microsoft\u2019s table. The default one is what Word writes when you press Save. The other is <strong>Strict Open XML Document<\/strong>, which Microsoft describes as conforming \u201cto the Strict profile of the Open XML standard (ISO\/IEC 29500)\u201d \u2014 a profile that \u201cdoesn\u2019t allow a set of features that are designed specifically for backward-compatibility with existing binary documents, as specified in Part 4 of ISO\/IEC 29500.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Read that backwards and it tells you what the <em>ordinary<\/em> <code>.docx<\/code> on your desk is: the <strong>Transitional<\/strong> profile, which deliberately keeps a set of features that exist only to carry the old binary formats forward. So the common line \u201cDOCX is an open ISO standard, so it\u2019s future-proof\u201d is true of the container and slightly generous about the contents. A normal <code>.docx<\/code> is standardised, but it is standardised <em>including<\/em> a compatibility layer whose whole purpose is to describe things the binary formats did.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This is not a reason to avoid <code>.docx<\/code> \u2014 it is by far the better of the two for anything you intend to keep. It is a reason not to treat the ISO badge as a guarantee that every byte inside is clean modern markup, and a reason a genuinely archival workflow reaches for PDF\/A or Strict Open XML rather than assuming the default save is enough.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"need-doc\">When you still need .doc<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The demand for the backward direction is real, and it is almost never about Word itself. Current Word reads and writes <code>.doc<\/code> perfectly well \u2014 it is right there in Microsoft\u2019s supported-formats list. The systems that force your hand are elsewhere:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\"><li><strong>Allowed-extension lists that predate 2007.<\/strong> An upload form, an intake portal, or a document-management system whose validator accepts <code>doc<\/code> and has simply never been updated. This is the single most common reason people search for DOCX to DOC.<\/li><li><strong>Legacy line-of-business software.<\/strong> Case-management, practice-management, and mail-merge systems that ingest the binary format directly with their own parser rather than by driving Word.<\/li><li><strong>Template engines and macros.<\/strong> Automation written against the binary format, or a <code>.dot<\/code> template chain that assumes <code>.doc<\/code> documents.<\/li><li><strong>Deliberately mixed environments.<\/strong> Institutions still run older word processors, and formats other than Word\u2019s persist in them \u2014 the Central District of California\u2019s e-filing FAQ, for example, still tells filers to open their \u201coriginal PDF, Word, or <strong>WordPerfect<\/strong> document.\u201d<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">What to expect going backwards: <code>.doc<\/code> predates every feature Word added after 2003, so anything with no representation in the older binary format has to be approximated, rasterised or dropped on the way out. That is the nature of saving into an older format, not a defect in a particular converter. <strong>Keep the <code>.docx<\/code> as your master and treat the <code>.doc<\/code> as a disposable delivery copy<\/strong>, and open the result before you send it \u2014 the more design content (SmartArt, modern charts, text effects, content controls, equations), the more carefully you should check.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The other direction is much safer. Converting <code>.doc<\/code> to <code>.docx<\/code> moves the content into a richer container that can express everything the old one could, and ordinary documents \u2014 text, headings, tables, inline images, standard styles \u2014 come through cleanly. Old files leaning on embedded OLE objects, legacy WordArt, or fonts that aren\u2019t installed on the rendering machine are where drift shows up, and that last one is font substitution rather than a format problem \u2014 the mechanism described in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.xconvert.com\/blog\/fonts-change-converting-to-pdf\/\">why your fonts move when you convert to PDF<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"wont-open\">When a .doc won\u2019t open<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Several distinct failures get reported as \u201cmy .doc won\u2019t open,\u201d and they have different fixes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>It opens, but Word says Compatibility Mode.<\/strong> Nothing is wrong. Word flags a legacy document so that newer features stay out of a file that can\u2019t hold them. If you plan to keep editing it, converting to <code>.docx<\/code> clears the flag permanently.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>It opens as gibberish, or Word calls it damaged.<\/strong> Often the file is not actually a Word binary document. Systems have historically emitted RTF or HTML with a <code>.doc<\/code> extension because that was what made Word open it \u2014 Microsoft\u2019s format table lists RTF and HTML as separate Word-supported formats, and the extension never reliably indicated the contents. Renaming a copy to <code>.rtf<\/code> or <code>.html<\/code> is a two-second diagnostic.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>It\u2019s blocked rather than broken.<\/strong> Documents that arrive by email or download open in a sandboxed view, and organisations can restrict which legacy formats their Office installations will load at all. If the file opens on a personal machine but not a managed one, the format is fine and the policy is the obstacle.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Nothing on the machine claims the extension.<\/strong> Google Docs, LibreOffice Writer and Word Online all open <code>.doc<\/code>. If none are available, converting to <code>.docx<\/code> \u2014 or to PDF, if you only need to read it \u2014 gets you moving without installing anything.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"tool\">Convert between DOC and DOCX on xconvert<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Both directions run through LibreOffice in headless mode on our servers, using the format\u2019s own filters: <code>.docx<\/code> is written with the <strong>MS Word 2007 XML<\/strong> filter and <code>.doc<\/code> with the <strong>MS Word 97<\/strong> filter, which LibreOffice\u2019s documentation maps to Word 97-2003. A legacy system gets the real binary format, not a renamed file.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ol class=\"wp-block-list\"><li>Open <a href=\"https:\/\/www.xconvert.com\/convert-doc-to-docx\">xconvert.com\/convert-doc-to-docx<\/a> to modernise, or <a href=\"https:\/\/www.xconvert.com\/convert-docx-to-doc\">convert-docx-to-doc<\/a> to go backwards.<\/li><li>Click <strong>Upload<\/strong> to add your file (from your computer, Google Drive, or Dropbox). Each page accepts only the source extension it names \u2014 <code>.doc<\/code> on one, <code>.docx<\/code> on the other \u2014 and you can queue a folder\u2019s worth in one batch.<\/li><li>Leave <strong>Advanced Options<\/strong> alone. The only group exposed for a Word-to-Word job is <strong>Compression Type<\/strong> (Screen (Best), Ebook, Default, Prepress, Printer), and there is no output-format choice to make because the target is fixed by the page.<\/li><li>Click <strong>Convert<\/strong> and download. Skim the result before you discard the original, especially in the DOCX-to-DOC direction.<\/li><\/ol>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Files upload over an encrypted connection, are processed on our servers, and are automatically deleted a few hours later. No sign-up, no watermark.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">If the destination actually wants a fixed-layout file rather than an editable one, PDF is the better answer \u2014 and going the other way, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.xconvert.com\/blog\/convert-pdf-to-word\/\">how to convert a PDF to Word<\/a> covers what that direction can and can\u2019t recover.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"faq\">FAQ<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<h5 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Is DOCX better than DOC?<\/h5>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For almost everything, yes. It is Word\u2019s default since 2007, it is XML inside a ZIP so the file is smaller and individual parts can often be recovered from a damaged document, and it is the format cloud editors and co-authoring expect. The only reason to prefer <code>.doc<\/code> is that something downstream requires it. Nothing about <code>.doc<\/code> makes a document more compatible with <em>current<\/em> software \u2014 it makes it compatible with <em>old<\/em> software.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h5 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Can modern Word still open .doc files?<\/h5>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Yes. <code>.doc<\/code> is listed in Microsoft\u2019s own table of formats supported in Word, alongside <code>.docx<\/code>, and current Word both reads and writes it. What changes is that the document opens in Compatibility Mode, so features that the binary format can\u2019t represent stay unavailable until you convert it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h5 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Will converting DOCX to DOC lose anything?<\/h5>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It can. <code>.doc<\/code> predates everything Word added after 2003, so features with no equivalent in the older binary format have to be approximated or dropped on the way out \u2014 that\u2019s inherent to saving into an older format. Plain text, headings, tables and standard styles are safe; heavy design elements are where you should look first. Always keep the <code>.docx<\/code> and treat the <code>.doc<\/code> as a delivery copy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h5 class=\"wp-block-heading\">What happened to my macros?<\/h5>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">They didn\u2019t survive the trip to plain <code>.docx<\/code>, and they were never going to. Microsoft\u2019s format table describes <code>.docm<\/code> as the XML format that \u201cstores Visual Basic for Applications (VBA) macro code\u201d \u2014 plain <code>.docx<\/code> is the macro-free variant. If the source <code>.doc<\/code> was carrying automation you need, save it as <code>.docm<\/code> in Word rather than converting to <code>.docx<\/code>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h5 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Why does my .doc open as a wall of symbols?<\/h5>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Most likely it isn\u2019t a Word binary document at all. Systems have long emitted RTF or HTML with a <code>.doc<\/code> extension because Word would open it anyway, and the extension has never guaranteed the contents. Rename a copy to <code>.rtf<\/code> or <code>.html<\/code> and try again \u2014 if it opens cleanly, that tells you what it really was.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h5 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Is .docx really an ISO standard?<\/h5>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The format family is \u2014 ISO\/IEC 29500 \u2014 but there are two profiles, and the <code>.docx<\/code> Word saves by default is the <strong>Transitional<\/strong> one. Microsoft describes the separate <strong>Strict Open XML Document<\/strong> save option as conforming to the Strict profile, which excludes the features that exist purely for backward compatibility with the old binary formats. So \u201cDOCX is an ISO standard\u201d is true of the family and a little generous about the default save.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Sources<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>Last verified 2026-08-31.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\"><li><a href=\"https:\/\/learn.microsoft.com\/en-us\/office\/compatibility\/office-file-format-reference\">Microsoft Learn \u2014 File format reference for Word, Excel, and PowerPoint<\/a> \u2014 definitions of <code>.doc<\/code>, <code>.docx<\/code>, Strict Open XML Document, <code>.docm<\/code>, <code>.dot<\/code>, <code>.dotx<\/code>, <code>.dotm<\/code>, <code>.rtf<\/code> and <code>.wps<\/code>; the note that ISO\/IEC 29500 Part 4 covers backward-compatibility features excluded from the Strict profile.<\/li><li><a href=\"https:\/\/learn.microsoft.com\/en-us\/openspecs\/office_file_formats\/ms-offdi\/e1b1a133-fb3e-40aa-8999-0d2661c12068\">Microsoft Learn \u2014 [MS-OFFDI]: Microsoft Word Persistence Formats<\/a> \u2014 the four formats Word persists to: Word Binary File Format <code>[MS-DOC]<\/code>, Ecma Office Open XML <code>[ECMA-376]<\/code>, Office Open XML <code>[ISO\/IEC 29500-1:2016]<\/code>, and OpenDocument.<\/li><li><a href=\"https:\/\/help.libreoffice.org\/latest\/en-US\/text\/shared\/guide\/convertfilters.html\">LibreOffice Help \u2014 Filter conversion names<\/a> \u2014 the <code>MS Word 97<\/code> filter maps to Word 97-2003 (<code>application\/msword<\/code>, <code>doc<\/code>) and <code>MS Word 2007 XML<\/code> to Word 2007 (<code>docx<\/code>); these are the filters our conversions use.<\/li><li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.cacd.uscourts.gov\/e-filing\/faqs\">U.S. District Court, C.D. California \u2014 E-Filing FAQs<\/a> \u2014 example of an institutional workflow that still names WordPerfect alongside Word and PDF.<\/li><\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>DOC vs DOCX explained from Microsoft&#8217;s own format reference: what each really is, when you still need .doc, and what saving backwards costs you.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":2204,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,14],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2206","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-how-to-guides","category-tools"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v28.7 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>DOC vs DOCX: Open Old Word Files, and When .doc Still Wins<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"DOC vs DOCX explained from Microsoft&#039;s own format reference: what each really is, when you still need .doc, and what saving backwards costs you.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.xconvert.com\/blog\/doc-vs-docx\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"DOC vs DOCX: Open Old Word Files, and When .doc Still Wins\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"DOC vs DOCX explained from Microsoft&#039;s own format reference: what each really is, when you still need .doc, and what saving backwards costs you.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.xconvert.com\/blog\/doc-vs-docx\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"XConvert Blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/xconvertcom\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-11-14T20:13:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.xconvert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/featured-77.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1600\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"840\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Stephanie Taylor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@xconvert_com\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@xconvert_com\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Stephanie Taylor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"11 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.xconvert.com\\\/blog\\\/doc-vs-docx#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.xconvert.com\\\/blog\\\/doc-vs-docx\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Stephanie Taylor\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.xconvert.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/ae9300506c0e9e85f1a6ece4d762980d\"},\"headline\":\"DOC vs DOCX: Open Old Word Files, and When .doc Still Wins\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-11-14T20:13:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.xconvert.com\\\/blog\\\/doc-vs-docx\"},\"wordCount\":2049,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.xconvert.com\\\/blog\\\/doc-vs-docx#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.xconvert.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/featured-77.png\",\"articleSection\":[\"How To Guides\",\"Tools\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-CA\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.xconvert.com\\\/blog\\\/doc-vs-docx\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.xconvert.com\\\/blog\\\/doc-vs-docx\",\"name\":\"DOC vs DOCX: Open Old Word Files, and When .doc Still Wins\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.xconvert.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.xconvert.com\\\/blog\\\/doc-vs-docx#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.xconvert.com\\\/blog\\\/doc-vs-docx#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.xconvert.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/featured-77.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-11-14T20:13:00+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.xconvert.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/ae9300506c0e9e85f1a6ece4d762980d\"},\"description\":\"DOC vs DOCX explained from Microsoft's own format reference: what each really is, when you still need .doc, and what saving backwards costs you.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.xconvert.com\\\/blog\\\/doc-vs-docx#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-CA\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.xconvert.com\\\/blog\\\/doc-vs-docx\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-CA\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.xconvert.com\\\/blog\\\/doc-vs-docx#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.xconvert.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/featured-77.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.xconvert.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/featured-77.png\",\"width\":1600,\"height\":840,\"caption\":\"The xconvert DOC to DOCX converter at \\\/convert-doc-to-docx with the Upload button highlighted \u2014 modernise a Word 97-2003 file\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.xconvert.com\\\/blog\\\/doc-vs-docx#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.xconvert.com\\\/blog\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"DOC vs DOCX: Open Old Word Files, and When .doc Still Wins\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.xconvert.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.xconvert.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"XConvert Blog\",\"description\":\"Blog for XConvert file converter\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.xconvert.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-CA\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.xconvert.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/ae9300506c0e9e85f1a6ece4d762980d\",\"name\":\"Stephanie Taylor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-CA\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/af9a54599087d3f3dd2d0ea950291c9e18fcc503af09b136b37fa52c418fe467?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/af9a54599087d3f3dd2d0ea950291c9e18fcc503af09b136b37fa52c418fe467?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/af9a54599087d3f3dd2d0ea950291c9e18fcc503af09b136b37fa52c418fe467?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Stephanie Taylor\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.xconvert.com\\\/blog\\\/author\\\/stephanie\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"DOC vs DOCX: Open Old Word Files, and When .doc Still Wins","description":"DOC vs DOCX explained from Microsoft's own format reference: what each really is, when you still need .doc, and what saving backwards costs you.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.xconvert.com\/blog\/doc-vs-docx","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"DOC vs DOCX: Open Old Word Files, and When .doc Still Wins","og_description":"DOC vs DOCX explained from Microsoft's own format reference: what each really is, when you still need .doc, and what saving backwards costs you.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.xconvert.com\/blog\/doc-vs-docx","og_site_name":"XConvert Blog","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/xconvertcom","article_published_time":"2026-11-14T20:13:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1600,"height":840,"url":"https:\/\/www.xconvert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/featured-77.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Stephanie Taylor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@xconvert_com","twitter_site":"@xconvert_com","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Stephanie Taylor","Est. reading time":"11 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.xconvert.com\/blog\/doc-vs-docx#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.xconvert.com\/blog\/doc-vs-docx"},"author":{"name":"Stephanie Taylor","@id":"https:\/\/www.xconvert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ae9300506c0e9e85f1a6ece4d762980d"},"headline":"DOC vs DOCX: Open Old Word Files, and When .doc Still Wins","datePublished":"2026-11-14T20:13:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.xconvert.com\/blog\/doc-vs-docx"},"wordCount":2049,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.xconvert.com\/blog\/doc-vs-docx#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.xconvert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/featured-77.png","articleSection":["How To Guides","Tools"],"inLanguage":"en-CA"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.xconvert.com\/blog\/doc-vs-docx","url":"https:\/\/www.xconvert.com\/blog\/doc-vs-docx","name":"DOC vs DOCX: Open Old Word Files, and When .doc Still Wins","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.xconvert.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.xconvert.com\/blog\/doc-vs-docx#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.xconvert.com\/blog\/doc-vs-docx#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.xconvert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/featured-77.png","datePublished":"2026-11-14T20:13:00+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.xconvert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ae9300506c0e9e85f1a6ece4d762980d"},"description":"DOC vs DOCX explained from Microsoft's own format reference: what each really is, when you still need .doc, and what saving backwards costs you.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.xconvert.com\/blog\/doc-vs-docx#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-CA","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.xconvert.com\/blog\/doc-vs-docx"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-CA","@id":"https:\/\/www.xconvert.com\/blog\/doc-vs-docx#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.xconvert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/featured-77.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.xconvert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/featured-77.png","width":1600,"height":840,"caption":"The xconvert DOC to DOCX converter at \/convert-doc-to-docx with the Upload button highlighted \u2014 modernise a Word 97-2003 file"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.xconvert.com\/blog\/doc-vs-docx#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.xconvert.com\/blog"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"DOC vs DOCX: Open Old Word Files, and When .doc Still Wins"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.xconvert.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.xconvert.com\/blog\/","name":"XConvert Blog","description":"Blog for XConvert file converter","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.xconvert.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-CA"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.xconvert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ae9300506c0e9e85f1a6ece4d762980d","name":"Stephanie Taylor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-CA","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/af9a54599087d3f3dd2d0ea950291c9e18fcc503af09b136b37fa52c418fe467?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/af9a54599087d3f3dd2d0ea950291c9e18fcc503af09b136b37fa52c418fe467?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/af9a54599087d3f3dd2d0ea950291c9e18fcc503af09b136b37fa52c418fe467?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Stephanie Taylor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.xconvert.com\/blog\/author\/stephanie"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.xconvert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2206","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.xconvert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.xconvert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.xconvert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.xconvert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2206"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.xconvert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2206\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2207,"href":"https:\/\/www.xconvert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2206\/revisions\/2207"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.xconvert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2204"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.xconvert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2206"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.xconvert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2206"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.xconvert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2206"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}