Initializing... drag & drop files here
Supports: 7Z
If someone told you they cannot open your 7z file, you are asking the right question. The short answer: keep 7z when you control both ends and want the smallest possible archive; convert to ZIP when the file has to open anywhere — an email attachment, an upload form, a colleague on a Mac — with nothing installed. This tool unpacks the 7z and repacks the same files as ZIP, so the contents come out byte-for-byte identical and only the container and its compression method change.
| Property | 7Z | ZIP |
|---|---|---|
| Introduced | 1999, with Igor Pavlov's 7-Zip archiver | 1989, by Phil Katz of PKWARE and Gary Conway |
| Compression methods | LZMA, LZMA2, PPMd, BZip2, Copy | DEFLATE (IETF RFC 1951) is the common choice |
| Typical archive size | Smaller, sometimes dramatically so on text and code | Larger for the same content |
| Solid compression | Yes — related files are compressed as one stream | No — each entry is stored and compressed separately |
| Encryption | AES-256 with SHA-256 key derivation, plus filename encryption | WinZip's AES-based open standard; legacy ZipCrypto is seriously flawed |
| Size ceiling | Effectively unlimited — 7-Zip documents file sizes up to 16 exabytes | 4 GiB and 65,535 entries in the base format; ZIP64 raises both to 16 EiB |
| Standardization | Open architecture, published by the 7-Zip project | Public domain since 1989; ISO/IEC 21320-1:2015 defines a conforming profile |
| Random access to one file | Slower inside a solid block — neighbours must be decoded first | Fast — every entry is independently decompressible |
| Best for | Long-term storage, large backups, transfers you control | Sharing, email, upload forms, cross-platform handoff |
| Platform | ZIP | 7Z |
|---|---|---|
| Windows 11 | Built in | Built in for reading since the November 2023 update (KB5032190), via libarchive — but not for password-encrypted archives |
| Windows 10 and earlier | Built in | Needs 7-Zip, PeaZip, WinRAR, or similar |
| macOS | Built in (Archive Utility) | Needs Keka, The Unarchiver, or another third-party app |
| iOS / iPadOS | Built in (Files app) | Needs a third-party archiver app |
| Android | Handled by the stock Files app on most devices | Needs a third-party archiver app |
| ChromeOS | Built in | Needs an app or extension |
| Linux | Built in on every mainstream desktop | Usually one package away (p7zip), not always preinstalled |
No. Both 7z and ZIP are lossless archive formats, so the files are decompressed out of the 7z and recompressed into the ZIP with their bytes unchanged. Documents, photos, spreadsheets, and code come out identical to what went in — only the wrapper and the compression algorithm differ.
Two reasons. DEFLATE, the method ZIP normally uses, is an older and less aggressive algorithm than the LZMA2 that 7z defaults to. And ZIP has no solid-compression mode: it compresses every entry independently, so it cannot exploit redundancy between similar files the way a solid 7z block does. On a folder of similar text files that gap is large; on a folder of JPEGs or MP4s it is close to nothing.
For reading, yes. Microsoft added native support for .7z, .rar, .tar, .gz and related formats to File Explorer in the November 2023 update (KB5032190), using the libarchive project, and Microsoft notes that this does not cover password-encrypted archives. That still leaves Windows 10, macOS, iOS, Android, and ChromeOS without built-in 7z support — which is why ZIP remains the safe choice when you do not know what the recipient is running.
Yes. Relative paths and nested directories stored in the 7z are written into the ZIP's entry names, so the archive unpacks with the same hierarchy it had originally. Empty directories and file ordering are preserved in the same way.
An encrypted 7z has to be decrypted before its contents can be read at all, and there is no password field on this page — so unlock it first with 7-Zip, Keka, or another archiver on your own machine, then upload the plain archive. The ZIP that comes back is not encrypted either; if you need protection on the result, re-add a password in your archiver after downloading.
Modification timestamps carry across, since both formats store them per entry. Unix permission bits and symbolic links are a weaker point: 7z and ZIP both have extension mechanisms for them, but support varies by the tool that eventually extracts the archive. For a Linux or macOS backup where permissions and symlinks must survive exactly, convert the 7z to TAR instead — TAR was designed for precisely that metadata.
Only with old software. The original ZIP format capped individual files, the total archive, and the entry count at 4 GiB and 65,535 entries, but the ZIP64 extension raises both to 16 EiB and is supported by every current archiver, including the ones built into Windows and macOS. A very old extraction tool is the realistic failure case, not the format itself.
Then skip the repack. The 7z extractor unpacks the archive and hands you its contents directly, which is what you want when you were only ever after one document inside it. Converting to ZIP makes sense when you need to forward the whole bundle to somebody else.
Yes — the ZIP to 7Z converter does the reverse trip. Because both formats are lossless, a round trip returns the same files, though the archive size will shift each way as the compression method changes. Nothing degrades from repeated conversions the way it would with lossy audio or video.
Files upload over an encrypted connection, are processed on our servers, and are deleted automatically after a few hours — no sign-up, no watermark, never shared or made public. The practical constraint on a big backup archive is upload size and time rather than anything in the ZIP format.