Initializing... drag & drop files here
Supports: AVIF
Both AVIF and WebP are modern formats that beat JPEG and PNG on file size, so the real question is reach versus efficiency. AVIF squeezes files smaller, but WebP has wider, older browser and app support — so if something is rejecting your AVIF or rendering a blank box, converting to WebP is usually the fix. If you only care about the smallest possible file and your audience is on current browsers, you can stay on AVIF.
| Property | AVIF | WebP |
|---|---|---|
| Full name | AV1 Image File Format | Web Picture format |
| Released | 2019 (AOMedia) | 2010 (Google) |
| Underlying codec | AV1 intra-frame | VP8 (lossy) / VP8L (lossless) |
| Color / bit depth | 8, 10, and 12-bit, HDR, wide color gamut | 8-bit |
| Transparency (alpha) | Yes | Yes |
| Animation | Yes | Yes |
| Typical size at equal quality | Smallest (~20-25% under WebP) | Small (lossy ~25-34% under JPEG) |
| Global browser support | ~93% | ~96% |
| First desktop Safari support | 16.1 (Oct 2022) | 14 (Sept 2020) |
| Decode CPU cost | Higher | Lower |
| Best for | Maximum compression, HDR photography | Broad compatibility with a small footprint |
<picture> element that falls back to WebP or JPEG for older clients anyway..avif images onto the page or click "Add Files." You can queue several at once and convert them with the same settings.Files are uploaded over an encrypted connection, processed on our servers, and deleted automatically after a few hours — never shared or made public.
Some quality loss is possible because both are lossy formats and you are re-encoding once. At the "Very High" preset the difference is hard to spot at normal viewing size. The bigger change is file size: because WebP is less efficient than AVIF, the same image usually gets larger in WebP, not smaller. If you need a guaranteed pixel-for-pixel copy, switch "Lossless?" to "Yes."
That is expected. AVIF compresses harder than WebP — typically 20-25% smaller for the same visual quality — so converting "down" to the less efficient format trades some of that saving for broader compatibility. You are buying reach, not a smaller file. If size is your only goal, keep the AVIF.
Yes. WebP supports an alpha channel in both its lossy and lossless modes, so transparent backgrounds carry over. Note that WebP is 8-bit, so if your AVIF used 10 or 12-bit color or HDR, that extra depth is flattened to 8-bit during conversion.
Usually, yes. Safari has supported lossy WebP since Safari 14 (iOS 14 / macOS Big Sur, 2020), which is older and more widely installed than AVIF support, which only arrived in Safari 16.1. Animated and lossless WebP need Safari 16 or newer. So a WebP file reaches more real-world Apple devices than an AVIF file does.
Yes — run it through WebP to AVIF to re-encode in the other direction. Keep in mind that each lossy round trip discards a little detail, so for archival work it is best to keep your original AVIF and treat the WebP as a derivative copy.
WebP already covers about 96% of users, but if you need to reach legacy browsers (older Internet Explorer, very old Android) the safest format is JPEG. Use AVIF to JPG for that — JPEG has no transparency, but it renders virtually everywhere.
In our testing, a 12-megapixel AVIF photo re-encoded at the "Very High" preset produced a WebP in the low-hundreds-of-kilobytes range, larger than the AVIF source but well under the same image as PNG. To hit a hard ceiling, use "Specific file size" and enter a target; the converter scales quality (and dimensions if needed) to land near it.