Initializing... drag & drop files here
Supports: JPG, JPEG, JFIF
WebP is Google's open image format, designed specifically to deliver smaller files than JPEG and PNG at matched visual quality. According to Google's developer documentation, WebP encodes photographs roughly 25-34% smaller than a JPEG at the same SSIM-matched quality, and supports both lossy and lossless compression in a single container — something JPEG cannot do. For an image-heavy site, swapping JPG for WebP typically cuts page weight by hundreds of kilobytes per view.
<picture> fallback.| Property | JPG (JPEG) | WebP | AVIF |
|---|---|---|---|
| Released | 1992 | 2010 | 2019 |
| Compression | Lossy only | Lossy + lossless | Lossy + lossless |
| Typical size vs JPG | Baseline | ~25-34% smaller | ~40-50% smaller |
| Transparency (alpha) | No | Yes | Yes |
| Animation | No | Yes | Yes |
| HDR / 10-bit color | No | No (8-bit) | Yes (10-12 bit) |
| Browser support (caniuse) | Universal | ~96% | ~94% (Chrome, FF, Safari 16+) |
| Encoder speed | Very fast | Fast | Slow (CPU-heavy) |
| Best for | Universal compatibility, email | Web pages, CMS, app assets | Hero images where every KB counts |
| Preset | Approx. WebP quality | Typical savings vs JPG q92 | Use for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Very High (Recommended) | ~92 | 25-30% | Photos, e-commerce, portfolios |
| High | ~80 | 35-45% | Blog post bodies, listings |
| Medium | ~65 | 50-60% | Thumbnails, lazy-loaded grids |
| Low | ~50 | 65-75% | Background patterns, decorative |
| Lossless: Yes | n/a (lossless) | ~20-25% vs equivalent PNG (lossless WebP is typically larger than a quality-92 JPG) | Screenshots, logos, UI mockups |
| Browser | First version with full WebP support |
|---|---|
| Chrome (desktop) | 32 (Jan 2014) |
| Firefox | 65 (Jan 2019) |
| Edge (Chromium) | 18 / all Chromium versions |
| Safari (macOS) | 16.0 (Sept 2022, full support; partial since 14.1) |
| Safari (iOS) | 14 (Sept 2020) |
| Opera | 19 |
| Android Browser | 4.2+ |
| Internet Explorer | Not supported (use JPG fallback) |
For typical photographs at the default Very High preset, expect 25-30% smaller files than a quality-92 JPEG with no visible difference. Already-compressed JPEGs (q70 or lower) save less — sometimes only 10-15% — because the JPEG quantization has already discarded detail that WebP cannot magically recover. Re-encoding a heavily compressed JPEG to WebP saves bytes but does not improve quality.
Use lossy (the default) for photos, banners, and any natural-content image — it is what WebP was designed for. Use lossless for screenshots, line art, logos with hard edges, and UI exports, where lossy compression can introduce ringing artifacts around text and edges. Lossless WebP is also a strong replacement for PNG; see PNG to WebP for that conversion.
In browsers, ~96% of global traffic supports WebP today (caniuse.com). For the remaining sliver — mostly very old iOS, IE, and some embedded WebViews — use the HTML <picture> element: <picture><source srcset="image.webp" type="image/webp"><img src="image.jpg" alt="..."></picture>. Email clients are a different story: Gmail and Apple Mail render WebP, but several corporate webmail clients and older Outlook builds still do not, so HTML email should stick with JPEG.
Yes. Google Images has indexed WebP since 2013 and explicitly recommends it in the Lighthouse "Serve images in next-gen formats" audit. WebP images appear in image search results, and improving LCP via smaller images is a documented Core Web Vitals factor.
Three common reasons. First, your source JPEG may already be heavily compressed (q60 or lower), so WebP has less redundancy to remove. Second, very small JPEGs (under 50 KB) have proportionally larger headers and per-block overhead, eroding the savings. Third, lossless WebP saves less than lossy — usually 20-25% versus PNG, but only modest savings over an already-compressed JPEG.
AVIF (AV1 Image File Format) is newer and typically 15-25% smaller than WebP at the same visual quality. AVIF supports 10-12-bit HDR color, which WebP does not. The trade-offs: AVIF encoding is much slower (often 10-20× WebP), browser support is slightly behind (~94% vs ~96%), and CDN/CMS tooling is less mature. Many sites serve AVIF as the primary <picture> source with WebP as fallback. Try JPG to AVIF to compare.
WebP supports embedded EXIF, XMP, and ICC color profiles. xconvert preserves the embedded ICC profile so colors remain accurate; EXIF orientation is applied to the pixels during conversion, so the WebP renders the correct way up even in viewers that ignore EXIF. If you need to strip metadata for privacy, that option is available in the advanced panel.
Yes. Upload as many JPG, JPEG, or JFIF files as you need — the same quality preset, lossless setting, and resolution apply to all. Each output WebP keeps the source filename with the extension swapped (vacation.jpg becomes vacation.webp), so you can drop the batch into your CMS or build pipeline without renaming. To go the other direction later, use WebP to JPG.
Almost always yes. The "Serve images in next-gen formats" opportunity is one of the highest-scoring fixes on image-heavy pages, and Lighthouse only reports the savings if they exceed 8 KiB per image. Pair the WebP swap with proper width/height attributes, loading="lazy" on below-the-fold images, and an LCP image preload to capture the full Core Web Vitals benefit.