Initializing... drag & drop files here
Supports: PNG
WebP is the image format Google created to replace PNG and JPEG on the web. It supports both lossless and lossy compression, full alpha transparency, and animation in a single container — features that previously required choosing between PNG, JPEG, or GIF. For the same visual quality, WebP files are dramatically smaller, which translates directly into faster page loads and better Core Web Vitals scores.
Accept: image/webp. Converting your asset library once unlocks that pipeline.| Property | PNG | WebP | AVIF | JPEG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compression | Lossless only | Lossless + lossy | Lossless + lossy | Lossy only |
| Alpha transparency | Yes | Yes (8-bit) | Yes (10-bit) | No |
| Typical size vs PNG | Baseline | 25-80% smaller | 30-90% smaller | N/A (no alpha) |
| Animation | No | Yes | Yes | No |
| Max dimensions | 2^31 px | 16,383 x 16,383 | 65,536 x 65,536 | 65,535 x 65,535 |
| Browser support (2026) | 100% | ~96% (Chrome 32+, FF 65+, Safari 16+) | ~94% (Chrome 85+, FF 93+, Safari 16.4+) | 100% |
| Best for | Print, legacy fallback | Default web image | Cutting-edge web, hero images | Photos without alpha |
| Source PNG content | Lossless WebP | Lossy WebP (Very High / Q85) |
|---|---|---|
| UI screenshots, flat-color graphics | ~20-30% smaller | ~50-70% smaller |
| Logos and icons with sharp edges | ~25-35% smaller | ~60-75% smaller (watch edges) |
| Photos saved as PNG | ~20-25% smaller | ~70-85% smaller |
| Diagrams with gradients | ~25-40% smaller | ~65-80% smaller |
| Already-compressed PNGs (pngquant'd) | ~5-15% smaller | ~40-60% smaller |
Numbers are typical ranges; actual results depend on image complexity, palette, and the chosen quality preset.
Use lossless if every pixel matters — UI screenshots for documentation, design system assets, pixel-art, or anything destined for further editing. Lossless WebP is typically 23-42% smaller than the source PNG (varies by PNG optimizer) with zero visual change. For photos, hero images, and decorative graphics, lossy WebP at the Very High preset (roughly Q80-85) typically delivers 60-80% smaller files with no visible difference to most viewers. If you'll re-export the file later, prefer lossless to avoid stacking generational loss.
Yes. WebP supports a full 8-bit alpha channel, identical to PNG-32. Transparent logos, icons, UI sprites, and graphics with semi-transparent shadows convert cleanly. One caveat: at very low lossy quality (below ~Q50) some encoders can introduce slight halos around semi-transparent edges — stay at Very High or use Lossless = Yes if your image has fine alpha gradients. See WebP to PNG for the reverse direction.
Effectively yes. Per caniuse.com, WebP is supported in ~96% of global browser sessions: Chrome 32+ (2014), Firefox 65+ (2019), Edge 18+ (2018), Opera 19+, and Safari 16+ on macOS Monterey 12.6+ or Ventura 13+ (partial since Safari 14). The remaining ~4% are legacy Internet Explorer, very old Android browsers, and some embedded WebViews. For those, serve a PNG fallback via <picture> with <source type="image/webp">.
Two common reasons. First, your PNG was probably already optimized — tools like pngquant, OptiPNG, or TinyPNG strip a lot of the easy wins, leaving WebP only 5-15% smaller in lossless mode. Switch to lossy (default Very High preset) to recover much larger savings. Second, very small icons (under ~2 KB) carry a fixed container overhead in WebP that eats into compression gains. For tiny assets, SVG is often a better target than WebP.
WebP does support animation, but the converter on this page handles single-frame PNGs and outputs still WebP. APNG files would lose their animation in this flow. If you need animated WebP, convert your APNG to GIF first, then use a GIF-to-WebP tool — or export the animation as a sprite sheet of stills and reassemble in CSS.
WebP is web-first. PowerPoint 2024, Keynote 14+, and Google Slides accept WebP, but many print workflows (InDesign, older versions of Photoshop, photo labs) still expect PNG, TIFF, or JPEG. If the destination is print or a legacy design tool, stick with PNG or convert through PNG to JPG. For embedded web docs, presentations, or modern Office suites, WebP works fine.
<picture> element or via the file directly?If your audience is broad, wrap WebP in <picture> with a PNG/JPEG fallback so the ~3-5% of clients without WebP still see something. If you control the audience (intranet, modern web app, CMS-fronted CDN with Accept-header negotiation), you can serve WebP directly. Cloudflare, Bunny, Imgix, and Shopify do the negotiation automatically when WebP is uploaded as the primary asset.
Yes. Upload multiple PNGs and they share the same quality, lossless, and resize settings — useful for processing entire asset libraries or screenshot folders in one pass. The job runs on our servers, so very large batches (1000+ images, multi-GB total) are constrained by upload size and connection speed; split into smaller batches if the tab slows down. For ongoing optimization see Compress PNG and Compress WebP.
For graphics with limited color palettes (icons, screenshots, line art), heavily-optimized PNG can occasionally match or beat lossless WebP by 5-10%. For photos, gradients, complex artwork, and anything with smooth color transitions, WebP wins decisively in both file size and perceived quality at a given bitrate. If your goal is the smallest possible web image without changing format, see Compress PNG; if you can change format, WebP almost always produces a smaller file.