Initializing... drag & drop files here
Supports: ODT
This tool lays out your OpenDocument Text (.odt) file and prints it to PostScript (.ps), Adobe's 1984 page-description language — a fixed-page stream of drawing commands meant for PostScript printers, RIPs, and Unix print pipelines. It is not an editable document, and for most people who land here the right target is PostScript's descendant, PDF. The table below shows which one you need; if it is PDF, use ODT to PDF instead.
| Property | PostScript (.ps) | |
|---|---|---|
| Created by | Adobe, 1984 | Adobe, 1993 — built on PostScript |
| What it is | Page-description and programming language (stack-based, Turing-complete) | Structured document container built on the same imaging model |
| Page model | Fixed pages, processed sequentially from the start | Fixed pages, randomly addressable via an index |
| Editable after conversion | No — a print stream, not reflowable text | No — but viewable, searchable, annotatable |
| On-screen viewing | Needs Ghostscript, GSview, or macOS Preview | Opens in every modern OS and browser |
| Search, hyperlinks, bookmarks | None — static drawing commands | Supported |
| Typical file size | Larger (text plus embedded streams, limited compression) | Smaller (flate-compressed object streams) |
| Native adoption | Specialized — prepress RIPs, Unix printing, label printers | Universal for sharing, viewing, and archival |
| Best for | Driving a PostScript printer or RIP, Unix lpr/Ghostscript pipelines |
Emailing, archiving, and reading a document anywhere |
.ps directly.lpr / lp.dvips-style pipeline that processes PostScript as an intermediate stage..ps file. No sign-up, no watermark.PDF is the better choice unless something downstream specifically requires PostScript. PDF is PostScript's descendant — Adobe shipped it in 1993 on the same page-imaging model, then added embedded fonts, metadata, search, and reliable on-screen viewing, which is why it became the standard for sharing documents. Convert ODT to .ps only for a legacy PostScript printer, a prepress RIP, or a Unix/Ghostscript print pipeline that reads PostScript directly. For everything else, ODT to PDF is the right fit.
Not in any practical sense. ODT is a reflowable, fully editable document; PostScript is the opposite — a print stream of drawing and typesetting commands describing finished pages, paginated at the moment of conversion. Once your ODT is "printed" to PostScript, line breaks and page layout are fixed and there is no editable text to rework. If you need to keep editing, keep the original .odt and re-export when you are done; if you only need a viewable copy, convert to PDF.
The document is laid out and rendered to fixed pages, so headings, paragraphs, tables, and images carry over as printed. Exact fidelity depends on fonts: where a typeface is available to the converter it can be embedded or outlined in the PostScript so the page prints the same elsewhere, and where it is not it is substituted with the closest match, which can shift line breaks and spacing on complex layouts. For straightforward business documents the result is faithful; for heavily designed pages, proof the output before sending it to a printer.
PostScript files are built for exactly this. Most Unix-like systems can pipe a .ps file to a print queue with lpr or lp, and Ghostscript — the open-source PostScript and PDF interpreter — can act as the raster image processor that turns the PostScript into dots for a non-PostScript printer. A common pattern is to feed the file through Ghostscript with its output piped to the print queue. If your target is a modern desktop printer rather than a RIP, you will usually have an easier time printing a PDF.
Ghostscript is the universal free interpreter and runs on Windows, macOS, and Linux; GSview adds a graphical front end on top of it. macOS Preview opens .ps files directly via its built-in PostScript filter. Most Windows installations do not ship with a PostScript viewer, so Ghostscript is the standard install there. Adobe Illustrator and image editors such as GIMP can also rasterize PostScript. This viewer friction is another reason PDF is the better pick when you simply need to read or share the file.
ODT is a ZIP package of compressed XML, so it stores text very compactly; PostScript stores explicit page-drawing commands plus embedded font and image data with limited compression, so the .ps output is routinely several times larger than the source document. For prepress or print-spooling use that trade-off is fine. If size matters, the Screen (Best) or Ebook compression preset downsamples embedded raster images to shrink the file.
Your file is uploaded over an encrypted connection and converted on our servers — there is no sign-up and no watermark, and your document is never shared or made public. Uploaded and converted files are deleted automatically a few hours after conversion. In our testing, a text-heavy ODT business document produces a .ps file noticeably larger than the source, because PostScript records explicit page-drawing commands instead of the compact zipped XML inside an .odt.