Initializing... drag & drop files here
Supports: TAR.BZ2
.tar.bz2 and its aliases .tbz2 and .tb2. Batch is supported — drop in several archives at once.A .tar.bz2 is two formats stacked together: tar bundles a directory tree into one stream, and bzip2 then compresses that stream. bzip2 was written by Julian Seward and first released in July 1996; it compresses with the Burrows–Wheeler transform on blocks of 100–900 kB. It packs files tighter than gzip but is slower to compress and noticeably slower to decompress, which is why it spread across Linux source mirrors and big-data pipelines but rarely appears on Windows. Common reasons to convert it:
.tar.bz2 with a double-click out of the box. Converting TAR.BZ2 to ZIP gives you an archive that File Explorer and Finder open natively — the most common reason people convert this format.tar payload stays the same; only the outer compression changes. Re-pack as TAR.GZ when you want gzip's faster, more universally available decompression, or as TAR.XZ when you want a smaller file and xz's fast extraction.| Format | Compressor | Compression ratio | Native on Windows | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TAR.BZ2 | bzip2 (Burrows–Wheeler) | High; slower to pack and unpack | No (needs 7-Zip / WSL) | Linux source tarballs, archival where size matters more than speed |
| TAR.GZ | gzip / DEFLATE | Moderate; fast both ways | No (needs 7-Zip / WSL) | Default Linux/Unix tarball, fast everyday packing |
| TAR.XZ | xz / LZMA2 | Highest; slow to pack, fast to unpack | No (needs 7-Zip / WSL) | Modern source distribution, biggest size savings |
| TAR | none | None (uncompressed) | No (needs 7-Zip / WSL) | Re-compressing later, or already-compressed contents |
| ZIP | DEFLATE | Moderate | Yes (built-in) | Cross-platform sharing, Windows and macOS users |
| 7Z | LZMA2 | High | No (needs 7-Zip) | Strong compression with an open, free toolchain |
| RAR | RAR (proprietary) | High | No (needs WinRAR) | Workflows already standardized on RAR |
A .tar.bz2 is a tar archive — a single bundle of many files and folders — that has then been compressed with bzip2. On Linux and macOS you can extract it from a terminal with tar -xjf file.tar.bz2. On Windows there's no built-in double-click support, so you either install a tool like 7-Zip, use WSL, or convert it to a ZIP, which both Windows and macOS unpack natively. Converting is the no-install route.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. gzip (.tar.gz) is the fastest to compress and decompress with a moderate ratio, which is why it's the default tarball format. bzip2 (.tar.bz2) packs tighter than gzip but is slower, and its decompression in particular is slow. xz (.tar.xz) gives the best compression ratio of the three and decompresses quickly, at the cost of slow compression. As a rule of thumb: pick gzip for speed, xz for the smallest file with fast extraction, and bzip2 mainly when you're matching an existing archive's format. For most "make it smaller" goals today, TAR.XZ is the better target.
No. Conversion is a repack, not a re-encode of your data — the files inside are decompressed from bzip2 and recompressed into the new container byte-for-byte intact. Filenames, folder structure, and contents come out identical; only the compression wrapper and, with ZIP, the archive format change. The output may be a different size because ZIP's DEFLATE compresses differently from bzip2, but nothing in your data is dropped or degraded.
Often, yes. ZIP uses DEFLATE (the same algorithm as gzip), which compresses less aggressively than bzip2, so the same contents can come out somewhat larger after conversion to ZIP. That trade is usually worth it when the goal is opening the archive without extra software. If you want to keep the file small and stay on a Unix-friendly format, convert to TAR.XZ instead, which typically beats bzip2 on ratio.
Yes. .tbz2 and .tb2 are short aliases for .tar.bz2 — a tar archive compressed with bzip2. They're the same format with a condensed extension, and this converter accepts all three on upload. If you have a stubborn .tbz2 that a program won't recognize, converting it to a more widely understood extension like ZIP or TAR.GZ usually clears the problem.
It's still maintained — the stable release is bzip2 1.0.8 (July 2019), with Micah Snyder as maintainer since 2021 — so existing .tar.bz2 files aren't going anywhere. That said, much of the Linux world has shifted source distribution to xz (.tar.xz) for its better ratio and faster decompression. There's no urgency to convert archives you already have, but for new compression where size matters, xz is generally the stronger choice.
There's no fixed per-file cap. Conversion runs on our servers, so the practical limit is upload size and your connection speed rather than your computer's memory. In our testing, a 300 MB .tar.bz2 converted to ZIP completed in well under a minute on a typical broadband connection, dominated by upload time rather than the repack itself. Batch jobs have no quantity limit — queue several archives and download them together.