Initializing... drag & drop files here
Supports: JPG, JPEG, JFIF
A .jfif is a JPEG. The JPEG File Interchange Format is defined by ITU-T Recommendation T.871 (2011) and ISO/IEC 10918-5 (2013), and a file carrying that extension holds the same bitstream and the same image/jpeg MIME type as any .jpg — Windows simply names it differently, because the registry maps the JPEG MIME type to .jfif. EPS is Encapsulated PostScript, the file a print shop, a sign maker, a journal template or an older desktop-publishing pipeline asks for when it wants artwork it can place on a page.
This converter decodes the JPEG and embeds the resulting pixels inside a PostScript wrapper. It does not trace anything, and no honest converter can turn a photograph into scalable vector paths. Two things are worth reading before you convert a batch: how large the result will be, and a specific trap that only affects files named .jfif.
.jfif, .jpg and .jpeg — all three are the same JPEG data — so a mixed folder can be queued in one job..eps. Files upload over an encrypted connection, are processed on our servers, and are deleted automatically after a few hours. No sign-up, no watermark..jfifPhotographs taken on a phone held sideways are stored the way the sensor read them, with an EXIF orientation tag telling software to rotate the picture before displaying it. Our converter normalises that tag before conversion for files named .jpg and .jpeg — but the check is keyed to the extension, and .jfif does not match it. A .jfif carrying an orientation tag therefore reaches the PostScript writer un-rotated, and because that writer does not read EXIF either, the picture lands in the EPS lying on its side.
The effect is easy to demonstrate. The same 600x400 JPEG with an orientation tag saying "rotate 90 degrees clockwise" produces a %%BoundingBox of 400x600 when it is named .jpg, and 600x400 when it is named .jfif. The bounding box, and the artwork with it, differ by a quarter turn.
The fix takes two seconds: rename the file to .jpg before uploading. Nothing inside changes — the bytes are identical, the extension is the only difference — and the orientation is then handled correctly. This matters most for photographs that came off a phone and were re-saved by Windows; images downloaded from a web page as .jfif almost never carry an orientation tag in the first place, because web images are normally already upright.
The raster inside the EPS is stored uncompressed, as seven-bit-clean ASCII hex in PostScript Level 1. That means every pixel becomes three bytes of colour and every byte becomes two hex characters, so the file lands at a little over twice the raw pixel count — and the JPEG you started from was compressed by a factor of twenty or more. A twentyfold to fortyfold increase in size is normal, not a fault.
We also write the EPS at 72 pixels per inch, so one pixel is exactly one PostScript point and the %%BoundingBox matches the image dimensions. Your layout program therefore opens the file enormous and soft at 100%, and you set the real resolution by scaling it on placement: effective PPI equals 72 divided by the placement scale.
| Source image | EPS file size | Bounding box | Size placed at 100% (72 PPI) | Size placed at 24% (300 PPI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 800 x 600 (web download) | 2.9 MB | 800 x 600 pt | 11.1 x 8.3 in | 2.7 x 2.0 in |
| 1920 x 1080 (screen capture) | 12.6 MB | 1920 x 1080 pt | 26.7 x 15.0 in | 6.4 x 3.6 in |
| 3000 x 2000 (6 MP camera) | 36.5 MB | 3000 x 2000 pt | 41.7 x 27.8 in | 10.0 x 6.7 in |
| 4032 x 3024 (12 MP phone) | 74.1 MB | 4032 x 3024 pt | 56.0 x 42.0 in | 13.4 x 10.1 in |
Read the last column as your real budget: a 12-megapixel phone photo will hold 300 PPI across about 13 inches, and a screenshot will not fill even a small print at that resolution. Lowering Resolution Percentage reduces the file but also reduces that budget, so use it only when the uncompressed EPS is too large to send.
| Property | EPS | TIFF | PNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| What the file holds | Raster embedded in PostScript | A page that can carry raster or vector | Raster | Raster |
| Pixel compression | None — uncompressed ASCII hex | Usually compressed | Lossless, or none | Lossless |
| Relative size, one 12 MP photo | 74 MB | A few MB | Tens of MB | Tens of MB |
| Declares a page bounding box | Yes | Yes | No | No |
| Places in InDesign, Illustrator, QuarkXPress | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Inserts into Microsoft Office | No — EPS insertion is disabled | Partially | Yes | Yes |
| Transparency | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Metadata retained by this converter | No — stripped | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Still requested by suppliers | Occasionally, on legacy spec sheets | Most often | Often | Often |
If nobody has specifically demanded .eps, JFIF to PDF does the same placement job in a fraction of the size, and JFIF to TIFF hands a printer full-quality pixels without the PostScript overhead.
No, and be wary of any converter that says otherwise. Vector artwork is made of paths and shapes; a JPEG is a grid of pixels. What we produce is a PostScript file with those pixels embedded as a raster image, which is exactly what EPS was designed to allow. It prints correctly at its natural size and softens when enlarged, like any photograph. Real vectorisation means auto-tracing, which reduces a photo to flat areas of colour and is a design decision rather than a file conversion.
Because of the .jfif extension, not the picture. Our converter normalises the EXIF orientation tag for files named .jpg and .jpeg, but the check does not match .jfif, so an orientation-tagged file reaches the PostScript writer un-rotated. Rename the file to .jpg — the bytes are identical and the uploader accepts both — and convert again. It will come out the right way up.
Because the two files do opposite things. JPEG discards perceptually redundant detail and entropy-codes what is left, which is how a 12-megapixel photo fits in two or three megabytes. The EPS stores the decoded pixels with no compression at all, written as hex text, at a little over twice the raw pixel count — 74 MB for that same 12-megapixel image, whatever it depicts. This is inherent to the format and there is no compression setting to turn on.
Effective resolution is set by placement, not by a stored value. We write the EPS at 72 pixels per inch so that one pixel equals one PostScript point and the bounding box lines up with the image, which tells you your true pixel budget. Scale the placed graphic to 24% for 300 PPI, or 48% for 150 PPI. If you need a specific printed width at 300 PPI, multiply that width in inches by 300 and check the source has that many pixels already.
No. Metadata is stripped during the conversion, so camera model, capture date, GPS coordinates and any embedded profile do not survive into the EPS. That is usually welcome when sending a photograph to a print supplier, because it removes the location data. If the profile has to travel with the image, JFIF to TIFF is the better handoff format.
No. The PostScript imaging model this output is built on has no alpha channel, and a JPEG has none to begin with — the format has never supported transparency. If you need a cut-out, you will have to mask the image in an editor working from a format that carries alpha.
It cannot. The JPEG discarded information when it was first saved, and embedding the decoded pixels in PostScript preserves exactly what came out of the decoder — including any blocking, ringing or banding already present. What the EPS gives you is a container a legacy print pipeline will accept, at a considerable cost in file size. Nothing about the wrapper improves the pixels.
.jfif and .jpg really the same thing?Yes. Both hold a JFIF-conformant JPEG bitstream, both use the image/jpeg MIME type, and renaming between them is a no-op for any JPEG decoder. The .jfif name appears because the Windows registry maps the JPEG MIME type to that extension, so Chromium-based browsers and several Microsoft applications save images with it. The one place the difference is not cosmetic is the orientation handling described above — which is a reason to rename, not a difference in the file.
Yes. Queue as many images as you like and each becomes its own .eps with the same setting applied, since Resolution Percentage is the only control and it is not per-file. Watch the total, though: uncompressed EPS files add up fast, and a hundred 12-megapixel photos is several gigabytes of output. If that is the situation, lower Resolution Percentage or ask whether the recipient will take PDFs instead.
Only when someone insists. Adobe's own tooling has pointed at PDF for years, PDF carries everything EPS could and more, modern RIPs handle it better, and Microsoft disabled EPS insertion in Office on security grounds because PostScript is a programming language that can carry executable content. EPS survives because specification sheets, sign shops and older asset-management systems were written around it. If the request came from a person rather than a form, ask whether JFIF to PDF is acceptable — it almost always is, and the file will be dramatically smaller.
They travel over an encrypted connection, are converted on our servers, and both the uploads and the EPS files produced from them are deleted automatically after a few hours. Nothing is shared or made public, no account is required, and the output carries no watermark.