Initializing... drag & drop files here
Supports: PNG, APNG
Almost everyone who searches for this is holding a PNG and facing a form, template, or piece of software that will only take a .jfif file. The short answer: JFIF is JPEG — the same lossy bitstream, under a different extension — so converting means accepting JPEG's trade-offs. Convert if the picture is photographic and something downstream demands the extension. Keep the PNG if it is a logo, screenshot, diagram, or anything with transparency you still need.
| Property | PNG | JFIF |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A complete image format | A container spec for the JPEG bitstream — ITU-T T.871, approved May 2011 |
| Current specification | W3C PNG Third Edition, 24 June 2025 | ITU-T T.871 (Erratum 1, March 2013) |
| Compression | Lossless | Lossy, discrete-cosine-transform based |
| Alpha / transparency | Yes, in greyscale+alpha and truecolor+alpha types | None at all |
| Sample depth | 1 to 16 bits per sample | 8 bits per component, truecolor only |
| Indexed / palette colour | Yes (PNG-8) | No |
| Equivalent extensions | .png, plus .apng for animation |
.jpg, .jpeg, .jpe, .jif, .jfif — all the same format |
| Animation | Yes, via APNG (acTL/fcTL/fdAT) |
No |
| Best at | Flat colour, text, UI, line art, anything needing exact pixels | Continuous-tone photographs |
| Re-encoding cost | None — repeated saves are identical | Each save discards more detail |
.jfif. This is the honest main reason the conversion exists..jfif assets so a script that filters on extension does not skip your file.The preset list is not a vague "better/worse" slider; each rung resolves to a specific JPEG quality value before the encoder runs.
| Preset | JPEG quality | Sensible for |
|---|---|---|
| Highest | 100 | Archival copies, or an image that will be re-edited |
| Very High (Recommended) | 95 | Default — visually indistinguishable from the PNG on photographs |
| High | 90 | General web use where a smaller file matters |
| Medium | 80 | Thumbnails and previews |
| Low | 70 | Bandwidth-constrained delivery |
| Very Low | 60 | When size beats fidelity outright |
| Lowest | 50 | Artifacts clearly visible; only for placeholders |
For every practical purpose, yes. JFIF is the file-interchange spec that describes how a JPEG bitstream is wrapped for exchange between systems, published by the ITU-T as Recommendation T.871 in May 2011. MDN lists .jpg, .jpeg, .jpe, .jif and .jfif as extensions of the same format. The conversion on this page re-encodes your PNG into a JPEG bitstream and names the result .jfif.
.jfif file to .jpg instead of converting?If you already have a .jfif, yes — renaming it changes the label, not the bytes, and every mainstream viewer will open it. But that does not help here, because you are starting from a PNG. A PNG renamed to .jfif is still PNG data with a misleading name, and any program that actually reads the file header will reject it. Real re-encoding is the only way across.
Yes — this direction is always lossy. PNG stores pixels exactly; JPEG throws away high-frequency detail to save space. On a photograph at the "Very High" preset the difference is generally hard to see. On a screenshot, logo, or anything with text you will see halos around the edges and mottling in flat areas. If your target accepts it, PNG to JPG is the same encoder writing the more universally recognised extension.
They are composited onto a solid colour, because JFIF has no alpha channel. In our pipeline the JPEG writer is never left to guess: it is always handed an explicit background value, which defaults to white and otherwise follows the Background Color you pick on this page. So if a white halo would look wrong against a dark layout, set the background to Black — or to whichever colour the image will sit on — before converting.
.jfif files in the first place?On Windows, a browser saving an image asks the system which extension belongs to the image/jpeg MIME type, and reads the answer from the registry. When that entry has been set to .jfif — by an installer, a policy, or an old application — every JPEG you save lands as .jfif instead of .jpg. The files are ordinary JPEGs; it is the registry mapping, not the download, that is unusual.
Start at "Very High" (quality 95) and only move to "Highest" (100) if the image will be re-edited and re-saved, since quality 100 mostly buys headroom for future re-encodes rather than visible detail. Dropping to "High" (90) usually cuts the file meaningfully with no perceptible change on photographic content, but is the first rung where flat-colour graphics start to show artifacts.
No. JPEG as MDN describes it is truecolor only, at 8 bits per component, with no indexed-colour mode and no dedicated greyscale type. PNG allows sample depths from 1 to 16 bits and five distinct image types. So a 16-bit PNG is quantised down to 8 bits per channel on the way out, and a paletted PNG-8 is expanded to full colour before compression.
This page accepts .apng as well as .png, but JFIF is a still format with no frame structure, so only the first frame is written out. If you need the whole animation preserved, convert to a format that can hold frames instead. To go back the other way and regain an alpha channel — though not the detail JPEG already discarded — use JFIF to PNG.