Initializing... drag & drop files here
Supports: AVCHD
AVCHD is the HD camcorder format Sony and Panasonic announced in May 2006 — H.264/AVC video with Dolby AC-3 or linear PCM audio, carried in an MPEG-2 transport stream. EPS is Encapsulated PostScript, the file a print shop, a sign maker or an InDesign template asks for when it wants a graphic it can place on a page. This converter sits between them: it decodes one frame of your camcorder footage and embeds it in a PostScript wrapper.
Two things decide whether that is a good idea, and both are covered below. The picture inside the EPS is a raster, not vector artwork, and no converter can turn photographic pixels into paths. And a great deal of AVCHD footage is interlaced — 1080i is the default on most consumer camcorders — which shows up in a print-bound still in a way it never does on a television.
.avchd file onto the page or click "+ Add Files" to browse. This page's uploader is scoped to the .avchd spelling; camcorder cards that write .MTS or .M2TS have their own pages. Several clips can be queued and share one set of settings.0, which captures the opening frame — type 47.5 for the frame forty-seven and a half seconds in. Multiple Screenshots samples the whole recording instead, at a Capture Rate running from 0.1 seconds up to 10 seconds per frame..eps. Files upload over an encrypted connection, are processed on our servers, and are deleted automatically after a few hours. No sign-up, no watermark.The raster inside an EPS produced here is stored uncompressed as ASCII-hex PostScript — Level 1, seven-bit clean, no image compression of any kind. That has two consequences worth knowing before you convert a stack of camcorder clips.
The first is file size. Every pixel becomes three bytes of colour, and every byte becomes two hex characters, so an EPS lands at a little over twice the raw pixel count. Measured on the same pipeline this page uses:
| AVCHD frame size | Raw RGB bytes | EPS file | Bounding box | Placed at 100% (72 PPI) | Placed at 24% (300 PPI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 720 x 480 (SD, NTSC) | 1.04 MB | 2.1 MB | 720 x 480 pt | 10.0 x 6.7 in | 2.4 x 1.6 in |
| 1280 x 720 (720p) | 2.76 MB | 5.6 MB | 1280 x 720 pt | 17.8 x 10.0 in | 4.3 x 2.4 in |
| 1440 x 1080 (anamorphic HD) | 4.67 MB | 9.5 MB | 1440 x 1080 pt | 20.0 x 15.0 in | 4.8 x 3.6 in |
| 1920 x 1080 (full HD) | 6.22 MB | 12.6 MB | 1920 x 1080 pt | 26.7 x 15.0 in | 6.4 x 3.6 in |
The second is placement. We write the EPS at one pixel to one PostScript point, so the bounding box is the pixel count expressed in points, and a point is 1/72 inch. Your layout program therefore opens a 1080p grab as a 26.7-inch-wide object at an effective 72 PPI — enormous and soft. That is not a defect and there is no DPI control to correct it, because effective resolution here is decided by the placement scale:
So a 1080p AVCHD frame will hold 300 PPI across about 6.4 inches, and no further. Lowering Resolution Percentage makes that worse, not better — use it only when the uncompressed file is too large to send, never to improve the print.
Consumer AVCHD camcorders overwhelmingly record 1080i or 576i/480i: each video frame is two fields captured 1/50 or 1/60 second apart and woven together. A television or a video player separates them again. A still image cannot — the frame we decode contains both fields, so anything that moved between them appears as horizontal comb teeth along its edges.
This conversion applies no deinterlacing, so those teeth go straight into the EPS. On a screen at thumbnail size you may not notice; at 300 PPI on a printed page they are unmistakable. Three ways around it:
Progressive AVCHD — 24p, and the 1080/50p and 1080/60p modes added by the 2011 AVCHD Progressive revision — has no such problem, because each frame was captured whole.
| Property | EPS | TIFF | PNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| What the file holds | Raster embedded in PostScript | Raster | Raster | Page description that can carry either |
| Pixel compression | None — uncompressed ASCII hex | Lossless, or none | Lossless | Depends on how the image was placed |
| Relative size, one 1080p frame | Largest by a wide margin | Large | Large | Moderate |
| Declares a page bounding box | Yes | No | No | Yes |
| Places in InDesign / Illustrator / QuarkXPress | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Inserts into Microsoft Office | No — EPS insertion is disabled | Yes | Yes | Partially |
| Alpha transparency | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Still requested by suppliers in 2026 | Occasionally, on legacy spec sheets | Often | Often | Most often |
If nobody has specifically asked for .eps, AVCHD to TIFF hands a printer the same pixels in a far smaller file, and AVCHD to PNG is the right answer for anything that is not a print layout.
No. A video frame is a grid of pixels, and what we produce is a PostScript file with those pixels embedded as a raster image — which is exactly what EPS was designed to allow. It places and prints correctly at its natural size, and enlarging it softens the picture just as enlarging any photo would. Real vectorisation means auto-tracing, which turns photographic content into flat blobs of colour; it is a design decision, not a file conversion.
Because the bounding box is written at one pixel per PostScript point, and a point is 1/72 inch — so a 1920 x 1080 frame declares itself as 1920 x 1080 points, or 26.7 x 15 inches. Nothing is wrong with the file. Scale the placed graphic down in your layout to reach the resolution you need: 24% gives 300 PPI, 48% gives 150 PPI.
There is no separate DPI instruction in this output to set. Effective resolution equals 72 divided by the placement scale, which is why 24% works out to 300 PPI. If you need a specific printed width at 300 PPI, multiply that width in inches by 300 and check the source frame already has that many pixels: a 1080p camcorder gives you 1920, which covers 6.4 inches and no more.
Because the footage is interlaced, which most consumer AVCHD is. The frame holds two fields captured a fiftieth or sixtieth of a second apart, and anything that moved between them lands on alternating scan lines. This conversion does no deinterlacing, so the pattern is carried into the still. Choose a moment with little movement, or deinterlace the clip in a video editor first and grab the frame from the progressive export.
Because the two files are doing opposite things. AVCHD uses H.264 at up to 24 Mbit/s — 28 Mbit/s in the 2011 Progressive revision — and predicts each frame from its neighbours, so a whole second of video costs a few megabytes. The EPS stores one frame with no compression at all, as hex text, which comes out at just over twice the raw pixel count. A 1080p frame is 12.6 MB whatever the picture shows.
The frame at zero seconds, because Frame Selection is preselected on Specific Frame with Time (seconds) set to 0. On camcorder footage that opening frame is often the least useful one in the clip — a lens cap, an exposure still settling, or a hand on the record button. Type a timecode from the middle of the shot instead.
No. The PostScript imaging model this output is built on has no alpha channel, and a decoded video frame is fully opaque to begin with — AVCHD cannot store transparency. If you need a cut-out you will have to mask the image in an editor afterwards, working from a format that carries alpha such as AVCHD to PNG.
No. Metadata is stripped during the conversion, so recording date, camera model and any embedded profile do not survive into the EPS. For handing artwork to a print supplier that is usually welcome. If the capture details need to travel with the image, use a raster format that stores them and keep the original clip as the record.
Because the EPS target exposes a deliberately small control surface: Keep original and Resolution Percentage are the whole of it. There is no quality preset because the raster is uncompressed and there is nothing to trade, and no preset resolution list because the meaningful sizing decision happens at placement time in your layout rather than at conversion time here.
Only when someone has specifically asked for it. PDF took over most of the print-delivery role EPS used to hold, modern layout applications place PDF, PNG and TIFF at least as happily, and Microsoft disabled EPS insertion in Office on security grounds because PostScript is a programming language. Choose EPS when a printer, a journal template or a legacy LaTeX pipeline names it; otherwise take the same frame as AVCHD to TIFF for print or AVCHD to PNG for everything else.